Not an outgroup, not yet an ingroup: Immigrants in the Stereotype Content Model
نویسندگان
چکیده
Stereotype research depicts the generic immigrant as incompetent and untrustworthy. The current research expands this image, specifying key information dimensions (e.g. nationality, socioeconomic status) about immigrants. To see how perceivers differentiate among particular immigrant groups, we extend a model of intergroup perception, the Stereotype Content Model (SCM; Fiske, Cuddy, Glick, & Xu, 2002. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902), to immigrant subgroups. The SCM predicts that perception centers on competence and warmth, and relates to targets’ perceived status and competition within society. Specified by nationality, race, ethnicity, and class, images of immigrants differ by both competence and warmth, with most groups receiving ambivalent (low–high or high–low) stereotypes rather than the uniform low–low for the generic immigrant. As predicted, ambivalent stereotypes reflect target nationality combined with socioeconomic status, supporting the SCM’s ambivalent stereotypes and social structural hypotheses, as well as better defining immigrant stereotypes and their contingencies. r 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
منابع مشابه
Stereotype Threat in the Marketplace:
How do consumers react when they believe that a transaction partner will view them through the lens of a stereotype? We predicted and found that being aware of a negative stereotype about a group to which one belongs (e.g., gender) made consumers sensitive to whether service providers were ingroup versus outgroup members, and lowered purchase intentions when the provider was an outgroup member....
متن کاملStereotype Inoculation: An Elegant and Practical Model
Nilanjana Dasgupta’s stereotype inoculation model brings together important theorizing about identity, belonging, and achievement to propose that ingroup members can be a “social vaccine” from the negative consequences of stereotypes and other cues of nonbelonging. We review highlights of the model, briefly describe two lines of new research that are consistent with it, and then pose questions ...
متن کاملPower effects on implicit prejudice and stereotyping: The role of intergroup face processing.
Power is thought to increase discrimination toward subordinate groups, yet its effect on different forms of implicit bias remains unclear. We tested whether power enhances implicit racial stereotyping, in addition to implicit prejudice (i.e., evaluative associations), and examined the effect of power on the automatic processing of faces during implicit tasks. Study 1 showed that manipulated hig...
متن کاملIngroup/outgroup membership modulates fairness consideration: neural signatures from ERPs and EEG oscillations
Previous studies have shown that ingroup/outgroup membership influences individual's fairness considerations. However, it is not clear yet how group membership influences brain activity when a recipient evaluates the fairness of asset distribution. In this study, subjects participated as recipients in an Ultimatum Game with alleged members of both an experimentally induced ingroup and outgroup....
متن کاملتأثیر اسنادهای علّی بر تصور قالبی در شرایط ترجیح درونگروهی: آیا تصور قالبی تغییر میکند؟
The effects of causal attributions on stereotype was examined in an experiment. Preliminary study showed that student studying in public universities have negative attitude towards IQ of Azad University students as compared with public university students. This stereotype was used as a means to determine the ingroup favoritism condition. In the main experiment, 80 Mohaggeg Ardabili university s...
متن کامل